Tuesday, August 6, 2019

On Philosophers and Their “Best” Students

Leonard Peikoff has written a baffling line at the end of his Preface to his book Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand: “To be objective, I identify the status of my work as follows: this book is the definitive statement of Ayn Rand’s philosophy—as interpreted by her best student and chosen heir.” Does he have to boast in the Preface that he was Rand’s “best student,” and “chosen heir”? In my opinion, is no connection between being a best student and a good philosopher; it’s often the “rebellious students” (the ones who disagree with their master on several issues) who often go one to prove themselves to be the inheritors of their master’s legacy.

We can consider the example of Plato and Aristotle. In his final years, Plato was disenchanted with Aristotle. He thought that Aristotle had moved away from Platonic teachings. Diogenes Laertius attributes the following line to Plato, “Aristotle spurns me, as colts kick the mother who bore them.” When Plato died, Aristotle was denied the position of the scholarch of Plato’s Academy—and he went on to found his own rival school. He refuted several of the key ideas of Plato. But the world today recognizes Aristotle as the “best student” of Plato. Even Plato, in the final years of his life, turned against his master Socrates. In his last dialogue the Laws, Plato rejects virtually everything that Socrates has preached in the Republic. He presents a version of the ideal state in which there is no Socratic philosopher king.

The schools in Ancient Greece (and in Ancient Ionia) used to encourage students to constructively criticize their master's teachings—they were tolerant of new ideas and logic. The ideas of Thales, the first philosopher of the Greek-Ionian tradition, were comprehensively refuted by his best student, Anaximander. Many ideas of Anaximander were, in turn, refuted by his own best student Anaximenes. Even in modern times, we find that almost every major philosopher has been refuted by his best students. How many good students of Immanuel Kant remained loyal to all his ideas? None. How many good students of Hegel remained loyal to all his ideas? None.


Anonymous said...

Whenever I come across an 'Objectivist' or read some mention of Peikoff, days of disciplining myself to be nice, wasted. I fall off the wagon. Lenny always reminded me of a yappy alley dog. When the big dogs retreated, Brandon, Kelly, etc, he finally stood up on his hind legs and said to Rand: I will remain loyal to your abuse cause I know it makes you happy!
I did enjoy much of Rand's fiction, I differed in calling the movement a philosophy. Systematic it was not. If a way of life or philosophy proves too difficult for its originator to live by with what face are they selling it to the public? This applies to so many, Rousseau, Ibsen, Marx, Sartre etc. Back on the wagon.

Anoop Verma said...

@ Hermione: Your perspective on Peikoff is spot-on. Rand ruined her legacy by starting objectivism.