Thursday, June 13, 2019

My Thoughts on Objectivism

Here are thoughts on Ayn Rand’s school of objectivism:

1. Whenever the objectivists are confronted with a new political or social problem, they look backwards towards their messiah Ayn Rand, who did her best work between the 1930s and 1950s, to find in her writing what she would think about this problem. Objectivism is the philosophy of past, the philosophy of archivists, the philosophy whose best time is now gone for good.

2. The objectivists are convinced that Ayn Rand has provided the solution to every philosophical and political problem in her writings. Doing one's own thinking, coming up with one's own ideas, have never been the objectivist way. The objectivists prefer philosophy that comes in a can which carries the label: Ayn Rand Cola.

3. A philosophical movement has not come of age till it outgrows its founder. Objectivism has no chance of outgrowing its founder. When Rand was around, objectivism was like a bonsai plant growing out of a small bottle kept on her study table. After her demise in 1982, Leonard Peikoff transferred the objectivist bonsai plant to his own study table. He waters and tends it as a religious duty everyday but he has no ambition of freeing it from the bottle.

4. The objectivists believe that they are revolutionaries who are fighting to create a better world. But they are no revolutionaries. They are a small cultish establishment. The objectivist movement was designed as a privately owned “business establishment” by Nathaniel Branden in the 1950s and 60s, and it has continued to function in more or less the same way after his departure in 1968.

5. Rudeness is generally a trait of the philosophers who are dogmatic, intolerant, and not confident of their own knowledge. The objectivists are often rude because they want to hide their intellectual weakness and project the impression of strength.

6. Objectivism is not a philosophy of living happily on earth because it has been founded by a lady who herself desperately quested for happiness but could not find it. The objectivists, who follow Rand blindly, don’t know what happiness is or how it can be achieved.

7. The objectivist project (as conceived by Ayn Rand) is huge and the people charged with managing it are “small”--this means that the aims of objectivism can never be achieved. The objectivists areintellectually and morally crushed by the weight of Rand’s grandiose undertaking. 

1 comment:

Moist Von Lipwig said...

These were not thoughts on Objectivism but nihilistic smears, none of which addressed the actual philosophy of Objectivism.